PM Modi’s Norway Visit and the Debate Over India’s Global Image


“Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi and H.E. Mr Rob Jetten, Prime Minister of the Netherlands, witnessed the signing of an agreement between Tata Electronics and ASML for India’s first front-end semiconductor fab in Dholera, Gujarat.” Source: MEA Media Center
PM Modi’s visit to Norway strengthened bilateral ties but sparked debate over media conduct and perceptions of India. The article highlights India’s growing global role and argues that many criticisms stem from outdated or selective narratives rather than an objective understanding.
by Imran Khurshid
Recently, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Norway as part of a multi-nation tour in an important move aimed at strengthening bilateral relations1. The visit was highly significant because it came after a long gap, as it was the first visit by an Indian Prime Minister to Norway since Indira Gandhi’s visit in 1983, making it the first such visit in more than four decades. The visit also took place amid changing geopolitics in the region and India’s expanding engagement with Nordic and European countries, particularly in areas such as green technology, clean energy transition, climate cooperation, innovation, digital connectivity, Arctic engagement, and emerging technologies2. During the visit, India and Norway elevated their ties to a Green Strategic Partnership, reflecting the focus and priorities of this relationship. Many important agreements were signed in sectors including clean energy, health, digital technology, education, maritime cooperation, trade, Arctic research, and development partnership initiatives for the Global South, making it a highly significant moment in bilateral relations.
The visit was viewed as a strategic step to strengthen India’s presence in Europe and to advance cooperation in future-oriented sectors.
Media Controversy, Western Perceptions, and the Question of India’s Global Narrative
However, a controversy erupted after a Norwegian journalist questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi about not taking questions from the media during the official interaction in Oslo, even though the event was an official press statement rather than a formal press conference with an open question-and-answer session3. In such formats, leaders typically deliver prepared statements after bilateral talks and do not participate in media questioning or interactive Q&A. Both Prime Minister Modi and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre delivered official statements in line with this format after their discussions. Despite this, the journalist questioned Modi about not answering questions from what was described as “the freest press in the world,” and the video later went viral on social media. This reflected a deliberate, harsh approach on the part of the journalist and appeared to be an attempt to create unnecessary disruption, despite the nature and format of the interaction already being clear4.
Later, during a press interaction involving officials from India’s Ministry of External Affairs and the Indian media delegation, the same journalist again raised questions about alleged human rights violations, press freedom, and other issues related to India, including why India should be trusted. However, during the exchange, while MEA Secretary (West) Sibi George was responding, she repeatedly interrupted him and appeared more interested in creating disturbances and steering the discussion towards a particular narrative, rather than patiently listening to the response. India’s Secretary strongly defended India’s constitutionalism, democratic framework, diversity, civilisational continuity, and global contributions, stating that “people have no understanding of the scale of India” and that many “read one or two news reports published by some godforsaken, ignorant NGOs and then come and ask questions.” The interaction increasingly appeared to suggest that she was more focused on posing questions, interrupting, and creating controversy than genuinely listening to the full response5.
If one believes in objectivity and freedom of the press, there should also be patience to hear differing perspectives and opposing viewpoints. The entire episode appeared more like an ambush and part of a predetermined agenda than genuine journalism. Freedom of expression does not belong only to the journalist; the speaker also has the right to present an answer that may differ from the journalist’s preconceived expectations. There must be patience to listen to others’ opinions as well, and there should be no intolerance toward giving space to alternative viewpoints6.
The controversy deepened when the Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten published a cartoon depicting Modi as a snake charmer, accompanied by a provocative headline. The cartoon carried racist undertones and reflected a lingering colonial-era mindset. Such stereotypes show that sections of the Western world still view India through outdated colonial lenses rather than appreciating its diversity and transformation. Many people online criticised the cartoon, describing it as insensitive and rooted in colonial stereotypes.
When India gained independence, many Western commentators and experts predicted that the country would not survive as a unified state. They argued that India’s vast diversity would lead to fragmentation and “Balkanisation.” Many newspapers and analysts at the time believed India would soon disintegrate. Similarly, when India held its first general elections in 1952, several Western observers expressed surprise, claiming that democracy and elections could not function in a poor and diverse country like India. They failed to appreciate the strength and resilience of Indian civilisation and democracy.
Today, as India has emerged as an important global player, many still find it difficult to accept this transformation. Racism against Indians on social media and elsewhere further reflects how some continue to view the world through a colonial mindset.
India’s Humanitarian Diplomacy and Its Case for Global Trust
During the COVID-19 pandemic, when several countries — including many developed nations — prioritised vaccine nationalism and closed their doors, India emerged as a trusted and responsible global partner by supplying vaccines to many countries, especially in the Global South, through its Vaccine Maitri initiative. This created shortages and pressure on India’s own population, yet India still acted responsibly and extended assistance to others7.
Whenever disasters or humanitarian crises occur, India often emerges as a first responder, providing assistance, relief materials, medicines, and humanitarian support across regions.
If one wishes to understand why the world should trust India, they should look at India’s contribution in Afghanistan, where India’s developmental role is widely appreciated by almost every Afghan8. There is substantial goodwill for India in the streets of Afghanistan, and this can also be gauged by the warmth and respect often shown to Indian visitors, and by the respect they show towards India. India has focused on high-impact community development projects such as hospitals, schools, dams, and infrastructure, as well as capacity-building (human resource development) initiatives aimed at long-term development.
One of Afghanistan’s key paediatric healthcare institutions, the Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health in Kabul, was built with Indian support and functions as the country’s leading children’s hospital. It operates under a near-constant high patient load, treating hundreds of outpatient and emergency cases daily due to overwhelming demand and limited healthcare capacity. Even today, when much of the world has forgotten Afghanistan and the challenges it faces, India continues to provide humanitarian aid, medicines, and food assistance, standing by the Afghan people in moments of distress.
Recently, on 5 April 2026, India dispatched a fresh consignment of Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) materials to Afghanistan following floods and earthquakes, including essential relief items such as kitchen sets, hygiene kits, tarpaulins, plastic sheets, sleeping bags, and other emergency supplies to support affected civilians9.
Similarly, in many African countries, India is building dams, hospitals, drinking-water projects, and healthcare infrastructure. India focuses on capacity building and development partnerships rather than debt-trap diplomacy. This is why the world should trust India.
India’s contribution during its G20 presidency in 2023 was also significant. India shifted the discourse of the forum from purely geopolitical conflicts, which many Western countries wanted to prioritise, to issues faced by the Global South, such as poverty, hunger, sustainable development, digital inclusion, and inclusive growth. It was under India’s presidency that the African Union became a permanent member of the G2010.
India’s policies on global issues are often guided by humanitarian considerations. Even regarding the conflict in Gaza, India’s official position has consistently supported a two-state solution. India also remains one of the strongest voices of the Global South11. On climate change and the Sustainable Development Goals, India has made significant progress independently and achieved several environmental targets while balancing developmental needs.
India has already crossed 50% of its installed electricity capacity from non-fossil fuel sources (2022–2023) ahead of its 2030 target and significantly expanded renewable energy, especially solar and wind12. It has reduced emissions intensity of GDP by around 36% (2005–2020) and achieved near-universal electricity access by 2019. Access to clean cooking fuels has also expanded since 2016 through large-scale LPG adoption programmes. India continues to advance its 2030 NDCs, including further reductions in emissions intensity and increased non-fossil fuel capacity towards 500 GW by 2030. On the Sustainable Development Goals, India has shown steady and measurable progress over the years, improving its performance across multiple indicators of the UN Sustainable Development Goals framework. Reflecting its commitment to sustainable development, India has also developed its own NITI Aayog-led SDG India Index, which tracks progress across states and union territories and encourages competitive improvement in implementation13.
Importantly, throughout its long civilisational history, India has never pursued expansionism or colonisation of other countries. India remains a constitutional democracy, and citizens are free to approach the courts if their rights are violated. There is a vibrant and free press, with thousands of television channels, newspapers, and digital platforms covering diverse opinions and issues every day.
Global Perceptions, and the Persistence of Colonial Stereotypes
India’s diversity itself is evidence against claims of authoritarian uniformity. The country comprises 28 states and several union territories, each with distinct languages, cuisines, cultures, and traditions. Travel from one part of India to another often feels like stepping into an entirely different cultural world. From the Northeast to Jammu and Kashmir, and from South India to Central India, the diversity is immense. If India were truly as intolerant as critics claim, such diversity would not have flourished so strongly.
The real issue is that many who comment on India often do not truly understand it. As India’s MEA Secretary noted, many critics rely on selectively chosen articles with particular agendas and then generalise them to the entire country. Similarly, selective visuals and short videos—often showing isolated or poorly maintained areas—are sometimes amplified through agenda-driven narratives and presented as representative of India as a whole, ignoring the country’s scale, diversity, and complexity14. Moreover, at a time when much of the world is facing instability and conflict, India remains a place of relative peace and democratic continuity.
Moreover, some countries actively support narratives intended to shape global perceptions in their favour and to damage the image of rival nations. India too faces organised campaigns by certain hostile neighbouring countries that sponsor narratives through media networks, scholars, journalists, researchers, and think tanks to project India negatively on the global stage15.
At the same time, India has often been viewed as a soft target. Many journalists would hesitate to ask similarly aggressive questions to authoritarian leaders elsewhere. There is also a communication gap on India’s part in effectively presenting its perspective globally. However, the persistence of colonial-era stereotypes and racist attitudes remains an important factor.
The cartoon portraying Modi as a snake charmer reflected exactly this mentality. While there is nothing inherently wrong with being a snake charmer, the way such imagery is selectively used against India reveals a colonial stereotype and reflects underlying racism in how such representations are framed. Ironically, those who use such stereotypes often describe themselves as civilised and liberal16. If liberalism means reducing civilisations to racist caricatures, it contradicts the very principles they claim to uphold.
Modern India has moved far beyond such outdated images. Today, Indian doctors, nurses, engineers, IT professionals, scientists, and other skilled professionals contribute significantly around the world and are respected globally. Yet some parts of the world still fail to appreciate India’s diversity, democratic resilience, and civilisational depth because they continue to view it through a colonial and prejudiced lens.
Dr Imran Khurshid is an Associate Fellow with Centre for Peace Studies, New Delhi. The views expressed here are personal.
Endnotes
1 “Narendra Modi Five-Nation Tour Live Updates: Norway, Trade, Investment, West Asia Crisis,” The Hindu, May 19, 2026, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/narendra-modi-five-nation-tour-live-updates-norway-trade-investment-west-asia-crisis/article70992687.ece
2 “After Sweden, PM Modi to Head to Norway for First Visit in 43 Years; Talks, MoUs, Nordic Summit Lined Up,” Firstpost, May 18, 2026, https://www.firstpost.com/india/after-sweden-pm-modi-to-head-to-norway-for-first-visit-in-43-years-talks-mous-nordic-summit-lined-up-14012363.html
3 “The Journalist Is Not the Story! A Shout Is Not a Question!” India Today, May 19, 2026, https://www.indiatoday.in/opinion/story/norwegian-journalist-helle-lyng-pm-modi-shout-not-a-question-2913982-2026-05-19
4 “‘No Understanding’: MEA Secretary’s Pointed Response to Norway Reporter; ‘Ignorant NGOs’ Retort,” The Times of India, May 19, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/no-understanding-of-the-scale-of-india-mea-slams-ignorant-ngo-reports-after-tense-press-clash-in-oslo/articleshow/131188336.cms
5 “Indian MEA News | ‘Reports By Ignorant NGOs’: India On Press Freedom, Rights Concerns In Oslo,” NDTV, May 19, 2026, https://www.ndtv.com/video/indian-mea-news-reports-by-ignorant-ngos-india-on-press-freedom-rights-concerns-in-oslo-1101232
6 “People Misunderstand India by Reading Reports by ‘Ignorant NGOs’: MEA Highlights Vast Media Landscape over Question Concerning Human Rights,” The Economic Times, May 19, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/people-misunderstand-india-by-reading-reports-by-ignorant-ngos-mea-highlights-vast-media-landscape-over-question-concerning-human-rights/articleshow/131189625.cms
7 Smriti Mallapaty, “India’s Stifling of Dissent Is Hurting Science,” Nature India, March 17, 2021, https://www.nature.com/articles/nindia.2021.31
8 Rani Mullen and Kashyap Arora, “Indian Development Cooperation with Afghanistan and the Afghan-India Friendship Dam,” Centre for Policy Research, June 16, 2016, https://cprindia.org/briefsreports/indian-development-cooperation-with-afghanistan-and-the-afghan-india-friendship-dam/
9 “India Sends Humanitarian Aid to Afghanistan Amid Floods & Earthquakes,” News On AIR, April 6, 2026, https://www.newsonair.gov.in/india-sends-humanitarian-aid-to-afghanistan-amid-floods-earthquakes
10 Members,” Associated Press, August 27, 2023, https://apnews.com/article/india-modi-g20-african-union-ef8982f795fb687fd2206cc793bdab21
11 “QUESTION NO. 3423 India’s Stands on the Palestine,” Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, Lok Sabha Unstarred Question, August 8, 2025, https://www.mea.gov.in/lok-sabha.htm?dtl/39979/QUESTION_NO_3423_INDIAS_STANDS_ON_THE_PALESTINE
12 “India Hits 50% Non-Fossil Power Milestone Ahead of 2030 Clean Energy Target,” Reuters, July 14, 2025, https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/india-hits-50-non-fossil-power-milestone-ahead-2030-clean-energy-target-2025-07-14
13 “India Achieves Major Milestone in Renewable Energy Capacity,” Press Information Bureau, Government of India, July 2024, https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2032857
14 “People Misunderstand India by Reading Reports by ‘Ignorant NGOs’: MEA Highlights Vast Media Landscape over Question Concerning Human Rights,” The Economic Times, May 19, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/people-misunderstand-india-by-reading-reports-by-ignorant-ngos-mea-highlights-vast-media-landscape-over-question-concerning-human-rights/articleshow/131189625.cms
15 Aayushi Rana, “The Great Wall of Propaganda: Chinese Information Warfare Campaign Against India,” DFRAC, May 28, 2025, https://dfrac.org/en/2025/05/28/the-great-wall-of-propaganda-chinese-information-warfare-campaign-against-india/.
16 Alex Abraham, “Norway Paper under Fire over Modi ‘Snake Charmer’ Cartoon,” Gulf News, May 21, 2026, https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/india/norway-paper-under-fire-over-modi-snake-charmer-cartoon-1.500548446































